Features
Explore how DraftLens handles multi-model review, review vs fix output, supporting evidence, and do-not-change locks—each as a focused capability for manuscripts you upload as DOCX or PDF.
Last updated 2026-05-11
How to read these pages
Each feature page explains what DraftLens does in production, why teams ask for it, where it breaks down, and what humans must still verify. Start with the capability you are evaluating—not the whole product at once.
Capabilities
Features
Prefer review mode when you want issues first; consider fix mode when your workflow expects change packages—subject to plan.
Multi-model review
Run complementary reviewers on the same manuscript (DOCX or PDF), then merge structured findings instead of chasing separate chats.
Best when one model’s blind spots are unacceptable for your draft.
Review mode
Issue ledger, digest, and exports—without silently rewriting your manuscript file.
Best when humans decide what becomes a redline.
Fix mode
Proposed edits and corrected packages for workflows that expect change artifacts—still with human verification.
Best when you want machine drafts you can inspect in Word.
Supporting files
Attach evidence (PDF, DOCX, text) so reviewers stay anchored to exhibits and policies. Pro capability.
Best for memos and agreements that cite external material.
Do-not-change locks
Tell reviewers which names, clauses, or figures must stay verbatim.
Best for contracts and regulated wording.
Workflow
Where features show up together
Product input
Need a feature? Tell us what's missing.
DraftLens is evolving quickly. Feature ideas, workflow pain points, and real document examples help us decide what ships next—whether something confused you, feels incomplete, or would make your review process calmer.
Request a capability, describe a document type we should support better, or spell out what would make DraftLens more useful day to day. Optional contact if you'd like a reply.